First of all, go check out the Carnival of Gamers, a monthly affair. This one is hosted at The Game Chair, and cleverly written it is too!
Also, I have turned comments back on and installed many levels of anti-spam software. Enjoy!
First of all, go check out the Carnival of Gamers, a monthly affair. This one is hosted at The Game Chair, and cleverly written it is too!
Also, I have turned comments back on and installed many levels of anti-spam software. Enjoy!
Welcome to the eleventh Carnival of Satire all. A few less posts than last week, but still some fun reading to be had. As there’s a few people coming from Instapundit (welcome all), I’ve added one of my own satires from this week, based on a controversy that made the rounds both in Canada and the US: Druids, pagans protest naming of Christmas tree.
Playah Grrl at Little Green Colloquium has her own amusing take on the Gangs of the Blogosphere, and in the process coins her own neologism.
Ferdinand T. Cat at Conservative Cat echoes our own concerns in It’s Time to Panic About Don Surber.
Leoniceno at Leoniceno’s Corner has a few ideas for Exit Strategies from Iraq.
Steve Pavlina at Steve Pavlina’s Personal Development Blog blows the lid off of empiricism in Musings on Reality, the Scientific Method, and the Cure for Dandruff. Continue Reading →
Ottawa (The Skwib) — Canadian voters yearning for intelligent debates of serious issues are going to be sadly disappointed this election.
But Canadian television viewers are in for a treat, as the four major parties and five television networks have agreed to new formats for four televised debates.
The first debate will be modeled after the inexplicably popular reality TV show, Fear Factor, and will be moderated by the host of Fear Factor, Joe Rogan. The only major departure from that show is there will be no water-based stunts for the leaders to engage in.
When asked why, the producers of the first debate said, “Dude, nobody wants to see Paul Martin in a Speedo.” Instead of money, the winner of the first debate is allowed to keep one other leader out of the second debate.
That will be a real disadvantage for that leader, as the second and third debates will have the same format, and not getting a chance to learn the ropes in the second will doubtless hinder his performance in the third.
These debates will be more traditional in that the leaders will have to answer questions about their party platforms — the difference? The moderator and a select group of Canadian voters will get to pelt the contestants leaders with wet sponges, cream pies and in the third debate, live hamsters.
The fourth debate will be moderated by William Shatner, and is modeled after the episode of Star Trek (the original series) where Kirk and Spock were forced to fight four of the most evil humanoids of all time, with only the help of Surek and Abe Lincoln. The networks have not yet announced who will be playing Kirk, Spock, Surek and Lincoln.
The Green Party has already announced that they will NOT be filing a law suit on this one.
Inspired by:
Format changed for election debates
Gulliver’s Travels (1726)“SATIRE is a sort of glass wherein beholders do generally discover everybody’s face but their own; which is the chief reason for that kind reception it meets with in the world, and that so very few are offended with it.”
Inspired by:
Jonathan Swift’s Birthday (Nov. 30, 1667)
Yesterday the Bonfire of the Vanities, hosted by Sean Gleeson, picked up one of our Beijing Olympic mascot bits, amongst other posts that should have been torched. (Sort of — it’s always amusing to read people with a self-depricating sense of humor.)
Today we’ve got the Tangled Bank, which is a collection of science-related posts and well worth a visit. Also, the Carnival of the Campaigns and later today, the Carnival of the Vanities.
![]() |
| The Irony Police charged Martin with an ‘unintional irony misdemeanor’ after a speech at the National Congress of Chinese Canadians |
Now that Dr. Tundra has gotten his wish for a Schadenfreude-y Christmas, the rest of us at The Skwib have decided to expand our normal offerings to include a more in-depth look at the Federal election campaign. Naturally, we thought it only fair that Dr. Tundra should provide the coverage. He begins this onerous task by examining some of the opening words of the campaign.
The Conservative leader Stephen Carper set forth on the high road, saying that the Liberals would run a negative campaign: “by spreading fear, by spreading lies” but in the end, he predicted, his party will win because: “hope beats fear 90 percent of the time.”
Unless, of course, hope is out having dinner:
“It’s like a thief who cries ‘Fire!’ in a crowded restaurant so that when no one is looking, he can clean out the cash register.”
Has Mr. Dithers hit the nail on the head with this pithy gem? Replace the word “ambition” with “greed”, and we have a fair description of the Liberal Party, n’est pas?
“I think it’s very clear that the Liberals have not earned people’s votes. It’s the New Democrats who, with a small caucus, have shown what can be done.”
Yes, it IS clear that Mr. Layabout has a serious case of member (of parliament) envy. However, he believes that he has proved the old maxim, it’s not the size, it’s what you do with it. To paraphrase the confused Mr. Carper, in this issue, I believe hope denies reality 90 percent of the time.
Happy campaign trails! I’m off to follow the Carper campaign tomorrow.
Dr. Tundra